|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nab a2200000 i 4500 |
| 001 |
publ2161 |
| 005 |
20250203103536.0 |
| 008 |
250203s2022 hu o 0|| Angol d |
| 022 |
|
|
|a 2666-2701
|
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 33164390
|2 mtmt
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a PPKE Publikáció Repozitórium
|b hun
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a Angol
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Csapodi Márton
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Reconciling Jurisdictions in the European System of Constitutional Adjudication
|h [elektronikus dokumentum] :
|b Reform proposals for the CJEU /
|c Csapodi Márton
|
| 260 |
|
|
|c 2022
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 231-245
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a HUNGARIAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EUROPEAN LAW
|v 10 No. 1
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a Several authors have concluded that an institutional reform of CJEU is necessary, with some putting forward reform proposals accordingly. This paper briefly recounts the reasons why such a reform may be indeed necessary, with due attention to the fact that national constitutional resistance to the Luxembourg court seems to be occurring with increasing frequency. In what follows, I present some of the institutional reform proposals that appeared in the academic discourse and make some critical observations in respect of these ideas. These proposals include: the introduction of a reverse preliminary reference procedure for cases related to national identity; a political override mechanism; a proposal for limiting preliminary reference rights to high courts (albeit with exceptions); and finally, the idea to establish a new court specialized in competence issues. Perhaps the latter proposal is the most popular, although various authors propose substantially different constructions. I conclude that a Subsidiarity Court specialized in competence issues could be an effective instrument for a better representation of national constitutional perspectives at the EU level, which would be essential, should open non-compliance be avoided. I also propose a complementary mechanism to the preliminary reference procedure, which would allow constitutional courts to participate in the European constitutional dialogue.
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://publikacio.ppke.hu/id/eprint/2161/1/Csapodi_Reconciling_Jurisdictions_in_the_European_System_of_Constitutional_Adjudication.pdf
|z Dokumentum-elérés
|